Our methods are the fitting of existing technologies to the needs of an existing community, but any development of the size we contemplate involves trade offs being made.

A wind driven ammonia plant with the associated greenhouse is going to require wind, water, an electric grid connection, access to both road and rail, and a labor force. Wind turbine placement often generates controversy, water usage is not a big deal but you must convince people of this in the context of permitting, someone is going to end up negotiating with the grid maintainer over transmission & distribution fees as well as the generating capability of the plant, you've got to move the product to market by road and rail, and none of this happens if you plan a two hundred employee plant in a place where fifty can't be found.

All of this goes through much more smoothly if you understand the lay of the land first and gather a group of people who represent interests who benefit from the new development. Even those who may initially be resistant to the idea can be won over thanks to the flexible nature of such construction. The only real loser in the mix is big oil.